I came across this information about six months ago on the site of the U.S. Communicable Disease Center in Atlanta.
"Nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently age 20 years will not reach their 65th birthday."
Besides unsafe sex, homosexuals also shorten their life spans by smoking cigarettes, using alcohol to excess, using drugs to prolong the pleasure of the sexual act, using recreational drugs, some engage in sad0-masochistic practices, have incredible levels of venereal disease infections, etc.
Transgender, transsexual and trans fats
In June I bought a full-page ad in our local gay newspaper during gay-pride week to bring attention to a lifestyle that is protected even though proven to be dangerous and unhealthy. If something is deemed unhealthy, it does not take a public vote before school boards, cities, the federal government and many parents take whatever steps are necessary to eliminate access to that danger.
How many times have you heard the unfairness, hatred and the mistreatment of trans fats? It is thought that trans fats may be unhealthy, along with sugar and salt. And the list of unhealthy food choices grows daily.
The Centers For Disease Control has said and proven that the homosexual lifestyle is unhealthy and dangerous to those who participate in it. I will prove that point a little later in this article. The evidence cannot be argued – ignored, yes, but not debated.
Where is the public outcry when this dangerous lifestyle choice is promoted by schools, cities, states, courts and the federal government? Where is the evidence that we care about homosexuals when a judge overturns the decision of 7 million voters who passed Proposition 8, and is applauded for encouraging many to marry while living this hurtful lifestyle? We stand strong on the danger (albeit highly debatable) of certain foods that we suspect might be injurious to our health but turn a blind eye to homosexuality, which inarguably kills its participants.
The National Day of Silence, sponsored by GLSEN, took place at schools across the country again in April. According to GLSEN'S website, "On the National Day of Silence hundreds of thousands of students nationwide take a vow of silence to bring attention to anti-LGBT name-calling, bullying and even harassment in their schools." In other words, the purpose of the day is to stand in solidarity with homosexual victims.
The illusion that the homosexual lifestyle is a normal way of living has been successfully propagated by promoting a "victim" image for homosexual persons and by the pseudo-science alleging a "gay" gene. Evidence does show that homosexual persons are indeed victims – but overwhelmingly of their own behavior, not that of others. Why do cities, states and our federal government help these victims by celebrating with them in gay-pride events, and why do schools celebrate an entire day during the National Day Of Silence? For those who are so health conscience, if you are truly interested in removing those things that are dangerous to society, you need to examine the question of why the deadly homosexual lifestyle is protected.
Why is the lie about the existence of the gay gene and the falsehood that homosexuals are not able to change because they were born that way so widely promoted? Think about this common-sense scenario: If a man ever got pregnant, could anyone say from that day forward that it is impossible for men to get pregnant? The answer is a resounding "no." You would never again be able to say it is impossible. Using the same logic, if one homosexual ever changed and got out of that lifestyle, can the statement be made that it is impossible for homosexuals to change?
The answer is again a resounding "no!" You would never again be able to say it is impossible. We know of many homosexuals, and I am friends with many, who have gotten out of the homosexual lifestyle by one decision – to stop. One of the most famous ones is the breakup of Ellen Degeneres and Ann Heche. Ann broke it off with Ellen and married a man and is living a heterosexual lifestyle at this very moment. I am black, was born black and will die black – I assure you of that. I can't even take a "don't ask, don't tell" policy, because it is obvious who I am. I have never met an ex-black man (even Michael Jackson could not accomplish that), but I have met countless ex-homosexuals who are living a victorious heterosexual life. Why do we allow the lie to continue to be perpetrated, and why do we keep encouraging homosexuals to stay in this deadly lifestyle?
I have read the Constitution and cannot find anywhere that it protects same-sex marriage. If the Constitution does not protect same-sex marriage, then how can a judge in California declare Proposition 8 unconstitutional? It is a perversion of the Constitution to give protection to a group that can move in and out of that group just by making a conscious decision.
According to the Centers For Disease Control website as of June 12, 2010:
- The No. 1 risk factor for contracting HIV/AIDS is and always has been homosexual sex.
- 56,000 new cases of HIV/AIDS are diagnosed each year in the U.S.
- As of 2006, there were 1 million people living with HIV/AIDS, up 11 percent from 2003.
- Homosexual/bisexual individuals are seven times more likely to contemplate or commit suicide.
- Homosexuals die decades earlier than heterosexuals.
- Nearly one-half of practicing homosexuals admit to 500 or more sex partners, and nearly one-third admit to 1,000 or more sex partners in a lifetime.
- Individuals who have ever engaged in homosexual sex are prohibited from donating blood. [Homosexuals are attempting to get that prohibition removed so that people who don't engage in unsafe sex or drug abuse might start getting HIV and/or AIDS.]
HatTip to Terry!
1 comment:
The reason that homosexuals want the blood donation prohibition removed ISN'T to infect people with AIDS. I'm honestly a bit aghast you just assume homosexuals to be homicidal maniacs (because anyone purposes trying to spread a deadly disease is that, or worse).
No, the reason that homosexuals want the prohibition lifted (and I've had this explained to me by advocates before) is that the prohibition treats all gays as if they're AIDS-infected, and that assumption is offensive. A dose of reason may be of use here: anyone donating blood has his or her blood tested for, amongst other things, AIDS, since many heterosexual blood donors are also at risk for AIDS (either from sex or intravenous drug use).
It was the Angelic Doctor, St. Thomas Aquinas, who suggested we impute to others the notion that they act in pursuit of the perceived good. Specifically, he quotes Aristotle for the notion that 'the good is that which all things desire.' So person X may have a muddled-notion of what the good is, or may have a terrible plan for how to achieve that good, but charity dictates that, whenever possible, we start from the proposition that even the wrong-headed are in a misguided pursuit of the good, not in pursuit of known evil. Given that, I think you should be more charitable to homosexuals in your posts. That said, I've enjoyed a number of your other posts. In the peace of Christ,
Joe.
Post a Comment