After having attended a couple of services at SJA, last Spring I attended one at St Stephen's. I knew one of its parishioners and suspected that there were problems far exceeding those that were known about with the "Joanies."
At the time, there was a deacon assigned as the "Parish Life Administrator" and a priest assigned for the 11:15 service as the "Sacramental Minister." His duties seemed mostly to look uncomfortable while the laity of St Stephen's fully participated in the service, often leaving him in his chair, off to the side. The deacon lived in a distant suburb. The Parish Pouncil pretty much ran the parish.
The "Sacramental Minister" and a woman walked together up to the altar, took their microphones and the "Mass" began with the female “minister” welcoming everyone and asking visitors to introduce themselves. The "Sacramental Minister" then said the introductory prayers and then stepped back and let the female “minister” lead the congregation in saying the Kyrie Eleison.
Then a middle aged man gave the second reading, the Epistle, letting us know that it would be accompanied by a poem by an environmental poet. It was Earth Day. Halfway through the reading, a woman (possibly his wife) joined the lector and assisted him in finishing the poem. Relieved, thinking to myself, well I’m glad that’s over, now we can get down to the meat of the Mass.
But the Sacramental Minister, legs crossed, looking extremely uncomfortable, remained seated next to the female “minister” and the couple proceeded to read the Gospel, taking turns. The couple remained at the microphone and then proceeded to give the homily, again in turn.
After the Gospel/Homily abomination, the Creed was omitted and there were “General Intercessions” coming from various members of the congregation. The Sacramental Minister remained seated, still ill at ease, crossing and uncrossing his legs, leaning over his knees, hands in his pocket, while the female “minister” continued to control the flow of the service.
At this time, I declared to myself that I was not in attendance at a Mass and made my plans to go elsewhere at 5:00 to a St Paul parish.
It got worse. The gifts were presented, pita bread and the de rigueur Kool Aid pitchers of wine, normally used by dissenting parishes. The Sacramental Minister remained seated. They were presented to laypeople. At this point, I started to lose track of what was going on. There was just too much wrong.
The female “minister” then said the priest’s “Blessed are you Lord” prayer while the Sacramental Minister watched.
Then at the “consecration” of the host and the wine into the Body and Blood of Christ, THE ENTIRE CONGREGATION RECITED THE WORDS OF THE CONSECRATION ALONG WITH THE PRIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He resumed saying the Eucharistic Prayer and when he raised the platter of pita bread at the “Great Amen”, THE FEMALE "MINISTER" RAISED THE K-MART GLASS GOBLET OF WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE PRECIOUS BLOOD UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES.
Nick Coleman, a columnist for the StarTribune and a fallen away cradle Catholic himself, has a column this morning on the most recent events at St Stephen's. Apparently a significant proportion of its members have formally, at least for today, decided to leave the parish and form their own parish in a building a few blocks away. Pray for them. And certainly pray for St Stephens' new pastor, Father Joe Williams, who starts at the end of March and for the parishioners who will remain.
For 40 years, St. Stephen's Catholic Church in Minneapolis has been a font of Christian compassion, service to the suffering and help to the poor.
Those good works will continue. But many of the good people who contributed their time, talents and resources to the $3 million-a-year social outreach of a historic, 119-year-old inner-city parish will not.
They will be without their worship home at St. Stephen's.
Exiles in their own parish, 100 or more members of the St. Stephen's community plan to march this morning from the church to a new home five blocks away, where they hope to continue the informal and spiritually arousing service that drew them to St. Stephen's in the first place.
You know the kind of service: with guitars, lay people giving homilies, dancing in the aisles with people who have mental and physical disabilities, gay couples openly participating in worship, along with ex-priests, ex-nuns and sundry other spiritual wanderers.
It's all so 1960s. The new church is more like the 1860s.
The 9 a.m. English-language pray- er service, believed to have begun in 1968, has been shut down by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, which has moved in recent years to bring all of its 219 parishes into conformity.
"They all have to play with the same playbook," says Dennis McGrath, spokesman for the archdiocese. "They've had plenty of warnings to get their act together."
The "playbook" is the GIRM -- "General Instructions of the Roman Missal" -- which spells out the rubrics for worship services. After the Second Ecumenical Vatican Council in the early 1960s, the orthodoxies loosened and churches, especially ones in needy neighborhoods like St. Stephen's, put more emphasis on carrying out the message of the Gospels than following the rubrics.
The 9 a.m. service in the school gym (there's also a 9 a.m. Spanish-language mass in the church sanctuary) became a place where all were welcomed, the wording of prayers was changed to make them inclusive ("Our Father and Mother, Who Art in Heaven," for example), women had leadership roles in services, and simple ceramics were used instead of chalices of precious metal, as called for in the rubrics.
The parish is getting a new pastor next month (it has had only part-time clergy), and McGrath says the archdiocese wanted to get things "straightened out" before the Rev. Joseph Williams arrives.
But similar changes are taking place across the archdiocese, which is getting new, conservative leadership from Co-adjutor Archbishop John Nienstedt, who will shortly succeed Archbishop Harry Flynn.
The changes have caused pain in St. Stephen's, at 2211 Clinton Av. S. in the Whittier neighborhood, near the Minneapolis Institute of Arts.
"How can it have been OK for 40 years -- even been encouraged because of the work we do -- and not be OK anymore?" asks Eileen Smith, a parishioner from St. Louis Park, who has been active in fundraising for St. Stephen's and thinks of the prayer service as her spiritual home. "They should hold us up as a model of service. Instead, they are giving us the boot."
"It's incredibly sad," says Mary Condon Peters of Golden Valley, who has belonged to St. Stephen's for 16 years and served on its parish council. "All these years, there was room in the big old Catholic tent for all of us. And now there isn't. And they gave us three weeks' notice."
It was on Feb. 5 that Flynn met with parish representatives and instructed them that the 9 a.m. prayer service must end. McGrath says that "nothing of substance" will change, and that the parish outreach to the poor, the homeless and the Hispanic community will go on.
So will support of those ministries by the St. Stephen's members who will march to a new prayer home today.
The last service was held last Sunday. About 200 people attended, many crying throughout the service, which ended with a tear-stained but joyful singing of "We Are Marching in the Light of God."
Today, they will march again. This time, to Park Avenue.
After gathering at the usual time at the school gym, many parishioners who considered the 9 a.m. prayer service the center of a rich faith experience will say a last prayer on the steps and then head five blocks east, exiles in the desert, to 2120 Park Av., where they plan to continue the Sunday prayer meetings that brought them together.
"We are supposed to learn how to 'pray right' or go away," Peters says. "Well, we are going to pray the way we think is right. And we are going to go away. With great sadness. But we will still pray." StarTribune
12 comments:
Leapin' lizards! I knew it was bad over there, but... wow. Of course, it's hardly surprising that the dissent is rooted so deeply, since, as they are saying with some confusion, it's been going on for 40 years and NOW it's "wrong"? Alas, it's always been wrong (and they would know that too, if they had ears to hear!) and they've been in schism for a long time - at least now the scishm is formal, which is preferable to those who think they can be in schism and still be in good standing in the Church.
We need to pray for those who remain and for Fr. Williams, and support him. Ray's efforts notwithstanding, I think that, for many of us, tor too many years we have let the dissident parishes segregate themselves from the Church and from the rest of us. We have fled from from them and perhaps abandoned the poor souls who drifted into their arm. We have avoided those parishes and only a few brave souls (the "Legion of Assisi") dared to return armed with rosaries and hope. I bet St. Stephen's isn't scoffing at those rosary bearers now!
Now, I think it's time some more of us step up and join Fr. Williams... we should organize a group to go to one of his first Masses there, to show the good people of St. Stephen's that the FUTURE CHURCH is joyful, excited, reverent, young (and young at heart :) and in LOVE with Jesus and His Church!!
Good thoughts, Mary. In your new life you might want to nominate St Stephen's as one of your intentions.
And I like the idea of supporting Father Williams. His first Sunday Mass will be March 30, Divine Mercy Sunday.
I doubt that he will have time to institute that devotion in two days.
Does anybody else have any thoughts?
I too was struck by the quote: How can it have been OK for 40 years -- even been encouraged because of the work we do -- and not be OK anymore?" asks Eileen Smith. It was wrong 40 years ago. We must always pray for our priests and bishops that they may exercise Christ's own authority in mercy and truth. I am just beginning to realize the enormity of that challenge in my own priestly life.
Supporting Fr. Williams is a noble idea. But does it have to be physical? Perhaps the inclusion of St. Stephen and their new pastor in your own participation in the Divine Mercy Novena would be appropriate. Then let Fr. Williams know through cards.
It is appropriate that it is Divine Mercy Sunday when he will assume his duty. His life as pastor must be marked by the Mercy of Christ for the sake of St. Stephen.
This is such a grace - St. Stephen's is so fortunate to be getting such a wonderful priest. Grace will abound and superabound there.
I would be willing to be in a group on DM Sunday to go there and support Fr. Williams and continue to pray for our schismatic brothers and sisters. In fact, I will blog that. Stay tuned.
Fr. Andrew:
That is an excellent idea, Father, the Novena to the Divine Mercy.
The last thing we need to do at the beginning is have a bunch of smiling orthodox Catholics showing up at St Stephen's greeting them with "Welcome Homes." They never thought they were away. Only Jesus knows where they were or are.
I will take responsibility for getting that going. The Divine Mercy chaplet and devotions have been very important to me. Maybe some of us might get together at some other parish that Sunday that will be having special services that day.
That is one of the funnniest things I have read today!
Ray- I didn't think of the dynamic of "foreign invaders" on that day. Good catch. It might be hard to stay humble in that situation. What we truly desire is a softening of hearts so they would be open to obedience.
I was just focusing on practicality. Also, as Cathy said- Why can't they follow the GIRM and run their soup kitchen? Mother Teresa did.
Folks, you may be more in the know than I am--but I had friends attending there about a decade ago, and they didn't say any of this stuff was going on (and I generally trust their judgment). They thought St Joan's went way too far, but St Stephen's didn't. So I really wonder about the "we've been doing this for 40 years" comments--I think something substantial changed in the last decade.
And I support the novena but not the Divine Mercy first mass. Let the priest introduce himself to the regulars without outsiders peeping in. Visit later.
Well that was confusing. Gracewatch is me (or Sic)...different email, blog that never got off the ground. Anyway, I claim responsibility for the above comment!
I was wondering who "Gracewatch" was. I like the comment but there was no email address, so I decided not to comment back since I had done so to some folks privately.
Thanks, I.C. or S.I.C. Is he still manacled?
Post a Comment